This review is written with a GPL 4.0 license and the rights contained therein shall supersede all TOS by any and all websites in regards to copying and sharing without proper authorization and permissions. Crossposted at WordPress, Blogspot & Librarything by Bookstooge’s Exalted Permission
Title: Much Ado About Nothing
Series: ———-
Author: William Shakespeare
Rating: 4 of 5 Stars
Genre: Play, Comedy
Pages: 84
Format: Digital Edition
Synopsis: |
Benedick, a womanizing batchelor who regularly speaks out against marriage, has come home from the wars with his friend Claudio. Claudio sees Hero, the daughter of a Don and immediately falls in love and she with him. Benedick claims he’ll never get married and spars verbally with Hero’s cousin Beatrice, who has as sharp a tongue as him. They both claim hatred of the other.
Claudio and Hero conspire to get Benedick and Beatrice together. Using gossip and reverse psychology, it works. However, Claudio’s illegitimate brother decides to cause problems. He makes it appear that Hero is a whore and discredits her before her father and Claudio. She feigns death while her name is cleared.
Then Hero & Claudio and Benedick & Beatrice get married and the rascally brother gets caught by the law.
My Thoughts: |
I went into this with a heavy heart. I was thinking to myself “Oh, not another Shakespeare, maybe I can skip a cycle”. I am glad I didn’t though. I had a blast reading this.
Beatrice was the kind of loud mouth woman that most men just want to put a rag in her mouth because she won’t shut up. It was hilarious. It also helped that she was one of the witty characters. Now, I did have some issues parsing what she was trying to say, what with her english being 400’ish years old, but for the most part I was able to get the gist of what she was trying to get across.
The only reason I gave this just a 4star instead of higher was because of how quickly both Beatrice and Benedick change their minds about the other. Yes, it is a very short play and for time constraints I understand, but it was almost literally a 180 degree reversal in the space of a minute.
Other than that, this was a true comedy. I’m thinking about tracking down a video version and seeing how it compares. Does anyone have any suggestions?
★★★★☆
There are lots of film versions to choose from! There’s a 2012 version that basically just the stage play filmed, then there’s more move-like versions such as the 1993 one.
LikeLiked by 2 people
Thanks. I’ll see if my library has either one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad you enjoyed this one more than the others you’ve read so far! I read this one last year. I liked Beatrice and Benedick, but was a bit annoyed with Claudio and Hero. I also loved the scenes with Dogberry, with all his messed-up words.
I watched the Branagh version from 1993. It was the only version I watched, so I don’t know if there are better ones. My experience so far with his versions is that they’re more traditional, close to the actual plays in both wording and setting, instead of trying to modernize or reinterpret them. That’s what I’m looking for, at least the first time. I liked the movie pretty well, although I was disappointed by the Dogberry scenes not being as funny as they were when I read them.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Dogberry had me rolling with his continual “write that down!”, as if writing something down was a magical process 🙂
Thanks for the nod to Branagh’s version. I liked his Henry V, so since I’m guessing Davekay was referencing this one in his comment too, I’ll probably go with it, IF the library has it of course
LikeLiked by 2 people
Once in a while I consider trying more Shakespeare but he’s so hit or miss for me that I never really feel the pull. I’ll never understand why anyone thinks Romeo & Juliet is romantic, then again, I think it’s mostly teenagers that feel that way.
BUT if I do, I’ll try this one.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shakespeare has been completely hit or miss for me too. This is just one of those things I’ve always wanted to do so I’m doing it now while I still have the oomph to do it.
This is a fun one though, for sure.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Branagh’s version is great (Emma Thompson, in particular is fantastic). There’s something to be special about Whedon’s, too. I’ve watched both several times – and I’m not partial to the Bard.
I do want to track down a copy of the one with David Tenant and Katherine Tate. Looks like fun.
LikeLiked by 2 people
there is one with Tennant and Tate? They had great chemistry on Dr Who, so I bet that version is a hoot.
LikeLike
that’s my theory, too. It’s available to rent online (clips on Youtube), I just haven’t found the time.
LikeLiked by 1 person
The version with Lunghi and Robert Lindsay.
LikeLiked by 1 person
My goodness, the options just keep increasing! How many times has this thing gone to screen?
LikeLiked by 1 person
I just went through my movie Shakespeare database: I watched 7 different versions. The best with Lunghi and Lindsay. It’s fabulous and I’m selling it short…The worst: the one with Branagh. It’s frigging awful.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You’re such a Shakespeare snob! 😉
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m more than that. I’m a book snob.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Me too. But only against certain genres 😉
LikeLike
If you want Branagh in his full splendour watch Hamlet (the uncut edition) and Henry V. Shakespeare on the big screen does not get any better than this.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I remember watching Henry V in highschool and then once or twice after that 🙂
LikeLike
Others have recommended Branagh’s version and I’ll just second or third that. As screen adaptations go it’s a very good one–traditional but also easy to follow and fun.
Although there’s also something to be said for seeing Shakespeare, especially the comedies, live. Years ago I saw a production in a park. When Benedick is hiding in the garden the actor playing him walked into the audience and put on one person’s cap and another person’s sunglasses, and started taking food out of people’s picnic baskets. It was pretty funny.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Actors think they can get away with anything these days! 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’d add my support to the Branagh version. Just be aware that it does cut out a lot of the soliloquy, so you aren’t getting the full play. I think Michael Keaton as Dogberry was a hoot.
If you want something a little different, Joss Whedon did a modern costume/setting version a few years ago that was interesting (Dogberry is a dumpy security guard played by Nathan Fillion).
LikeLiked by 1 person
A version with Fillion? Man, how many versions are there!?!
I feel like I’m drowning in riches here 🙂
LikeLiked by 1 person
I’m glad you enjoyed this one! It can be hard to parse the humor of Shakespeare’s English (and era) but I do think a lot of this one stayed funny over the years.
LikeLiked by 1 person
I do wonder how many more generations Shakespeare will still be around before he is almost a different language?
LikeLike
That is a very good question! The meanings of a lot of words have changed a lot since Shakespeare’s time. Lots of pronunciations are slightly different, too, so the rhymes don’t always match up anymore.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Oh, the meanings have changed immensely! It was so interesting to see the change. Makes it real how languages are truly living things 🙂
LikeLike
Language study is fascinating!
LikeLiked by 1 person
A review of the play by Overly Sarcastic Productions, you might enjoy. https://youtu.be/9-AGIUNsGgA
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thanks. I’ll have to check it out later this evening. I like the sound of the Reviewer just from their name 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Sounds like a good piece of Mr. Shakez. Got to admit that things written in Old English, or anything close to it, is tough on the brain though!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yeah, no breezing your way through these plays. some of the words simply don’t mean what they do they today and you have to figure it out from context. If you like that kind of thing, then Shakespeare is your jam.
LikeLiked by 1 person
Well, I did adore Clockwork Orange, so I imagine I’ll somehow find some fun deciphering Shakez. 😀
LikeLiked by 1 person
Never heard of this title before. Then again, my english aint the strongest point always
LikeLiked by 1 person
Shakespeare has a massive body of work. I don’t know if I’ve heard of them all 🙂
Part of the reason I’m doing this whole Complete Shakespeare read…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Seems like it might take a while still
LikeLiked by 1 person
I think I figured it was going to take over 5 years at my current pace…
LikeLiked by 1 person
Hurray! I’m so glad you liked it, it’s my favourite Shakespeare play and I love watching it performed every single time! The BBC did a modern version of it back in 2005 as part of a mini-series and it’s fantastic!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Do you happen to remember who was in it? With all these suggestions from everyone I need specifics 🙂
LikeLike
Damian Lewis and Sarah Parish and Billie Piper were all in it, and it came out in 2005
LikeLiked by 2 people
Billie Piper? Great! Thanks….
LikeLike
Oh! And a very young Tom Ellis, which kinda threw me when I rewatched it a couple months ago and had that ‘Wait, I know you, who *are* you?’ moment!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Great review!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Thank you.
LikeLiked by 1 person
You are welcome 🙏
LikeLiked by 1 person
Yay- so glad you had a blast! This is a fun one as well 🙂 And I really like the Kenneth Branagh version!
LikeLiked by 1 person
Chalk up another vote for the Branagh version! That one seems to be the most popular.
LikeLiked by 1 person
It’s really good!
LikeLiked by 1 person